Discussion
Hydronephrosis is an obstructive or non-obstructive
nephropathy that is a commonly identified disease during pediatric abdominal ultrasonography.
Congenital obstructive nephropathy constitutes the single most important
identifiable cause of renal impairment in infants and children [10-12]. In
obstructive nephropathy, interstitial fibrosis eventually develops and leads to
a loss of nephrons [10].
Numerous papers that focus on the molecular biological mechanisms
associated with renal interstitial fibrosis due to obstructive nephropathy have
been recently published [10,13,14]. However, there is limited radiological
research on renal interstitial fibrosis in the case of hydronephrosis. This
could be attributed to the difficulty of detection, evaluation, and
quantification of interstitial fibrosis by radiological methods.
There are many studies that explored ARFI measurements as a
means of evaluating tissue stiffness, including several studies on kidneys.
Gallotti et al. [6], Eiler et al. [7], and Goertz et al. [8] measured the ARFI
velocities of normal kidneys in healthy adults.
Further, there have been several trials using ARFI in adult
kidneys to evaluate renal masses, to assess renal allograft fibrosis, and to detect
chronic kidney diseases [15-17]. However, there is a lack of studies involving
ARFI measurements in young children. This could be attributed to the fact that
the previously used low-frequency transducer is not effective in the case of
such small patients.
However, the availability of the 4-9-MHz high-frequency
linear transducer makes it possible to measure SWVs in small subjects. Recently,
our group demonstrated normal values of SWVs using ARFI in pediatric abdominal
organs including kidneys in 202 children with an average age of 8.1±4.7 years
[1]. The mean SWVs were 2.19 m/sec for the right kidney and 2.33 m/sec for the
left kidney in the above mentioned study. The previously reported mean SWVs in
normal adult kidneys were 2.24-2.37 m/sec, with no significant difference
between the right and the left kidney [6,8]. The median SWVs in normal kidneys
in the present study were 1.75 m/sec without any difference between the right
and the left ones. This value is relatively low as compared to that obtained in
previous studies. However, this result is comparable with that of our previous study,
which concluded that the mean ARFI SWV for the kidneys increased according to
age in children less than 5 years of age [1].
In this study, we only included children under the age of 24
months. Only one study has been performed on the evaluation of diseased kidneys
in children. Bruno et al. [5] conducted a study of ARFI measurements in
pediatric patients with vesicoureteral reflux. The study suggested that ARFI
can provide reliable information about the severity of renal damage and maybe
useful in the diagnostic workup in children with a chronic reflux renal
disease. However, the patient age in the study ranged from 8 to 16 years.
Therefore, our study is the first report evaluating ARFI for hydronephrotic
kidneys in young children.
We aimed to correlate SWVs with the hydronephrosis grade.
Even though there are hydronephrosis grading systems on ultrasonography [11,18,19],
these could not definitely differentiate between obstructive and
non-obstructive hydronephrosis. Further, these systems cannot suggest the grade
of renal parenchymal fibrosis. If SWVs have a correlation with the renal
parenchymal stiffness, its measurement would be helpful in evaluating the
status of a patient’s kidney. Further, SWV can show a continuous spectrum of
stiffness.
On the other hand, the grading system has an ordinal scale
that cannot show a continuous value. Therefore, elastography has
a possibility of having an additional value to evaluate
hydronephrosis. In our study, there was a significant difference in the
median SWVs between normal kidneys (1.75 m/sec) and high-grade
hydronephrotic kidneys (2.02 m/sec). This suggests that elasticity
decreases and stiffness increases in high-grade hydronephrotic kidneys.
However, ARFI measurements cannot differentiate the cause of
stiffness change such as tissue fibrosis and edema. Further research with a large
group of patients and pathologic correlation is needed.
We also compared SWVs for a hydronephrotic kidney with and without UPJO. Further, there were only seven patients proven to have UPJO during the study period. The mean ARFI velocities were 0.69-2.51 m/sec for hydronephrotic kidneys without UPJO and 1.54-2.72 m/sec for those with UPJO; there was no statistical difference. Kidneys with VUR and a parenchymal scar change also exhibited no remarkable difference in SWVs. This could be attributed to the small number of patients, variable interstitial fibrosis of the UPJO group, and heterogeneous parenchymal scar change in the refluxing kidneys. This needs further evaluation with a large number of patients.
We also compared SWVs for a hydronephrotic kidney with and without UPJO. Further, there were only seven patients proven to have UPJO during the study period. The mean ARFI velocities were 0.69-2.51 m/sec for hydronephrotic kidneys without UPJO and 1.54-2.72 m/sec for those with UPJO; there was no statistical difference. Kidneys with VUR and a parenchymal scar change also exhibited no remarkable difference in SWVs. This could be attributed to the small number of patients, variable interstitial fibrosis of the UPJO group, and heterogeneous parenchymal scar change in the refluxing kidneys. This needs further evaluation with a large number of patients.
This study has several limitations. Almost all previous
studies performed in adults measured about 5-10 valid SWVs and used mean
values. However, due to the characteristics of the pediatric patient group,
only three valid SWVs were obtained in this study.
Repetitive measurements over a long time while subjects hold
their breath is not possible in many children, particularly young children.
Although only three valid ARFI velocities were attempted, two children could
not tolerate the examinations and the success rate was 96%. Moreover, subjects
were allowed to breathe freely during measurements. Thiscan increase the
variability of SWV. The development of a method to measure SWV without breathholding
would lead to more reliable results.
The second limitation is the
representativeness of the ARFI value.To represent a global kidney, measurement
should be performed on multiple sites of the kidney, such as the upper, mid-,
and lower poles. However, if the upper and lower poles are to be imaged, it is
necessary to use a similar angle of incidence in all patients relative to the
tubular system to avoid anisotropy issues. It is conceivable that shear waves generated
within the kidney move at different velocities depending on the angle of incidence [20]. We tried to measure SWVs at
the same portion of the mid-pole from the axial view, as parallel to the tubular
system as possible in order to reduce the angle effect. The variation of the
depth of the ROI position should also be considered.
We targeted renal parenchyma, including both the renal
cortex and the medulla, from the axial view in each patient. Therefore, we
might expect that the depth of the ROI position would be different between
patients and could increase according to the body size. Further study is needed
to evaluate the effect of the depth of the ROI position and the body size in
children.
The fourth limitation is that we considered the contralateral kidneys
without hydronephrosis as normal in the hydronephrosis group. Even though we
demonstrated no significant difference in SWVs between normal kidneys in the normal group and contralateral kidneys
in the hydronephrosis group, there could have been a physiological
change in the bilateral kidneys of the hydronephrosis group.
In conclusion, obtaining ARFI measurements of kidneys using a
high-frequency transducer is feasible in very young pediatric patients. The
median SWV of normal kidneys in children under the age of 24 months was 1.75
m/sec. These velocities increased in high-grade hydronephrotic kidneys but were
not helpful in differentiating hydronephrotic kidneys with and without UPJO.
Beomseok Sohn; Myung-Joon Kim; Sang Won Han; Young Jae Im;
Mi-Jung Lee.
AT MEDIC CENTER:
We applied ARFI technique from Siemens S2000 to evaluate whether fibrotic process existing in adult hydronephrosis.
Using 1-4 MHz convex probe we calculated in 3 positions of hydronephotic kidney due to obstruction [stone, outside compression] (n=27 cases), due to ureteropelvic junction obstruction [UPJO] (n=30 cases]. We had a control group of normal kidney (n=36 cases).
AT MEDIC CENTER:
We applied ARFI technique from Siemens S2000 to evaluate whether fibrotic process existing in adult hydronephrosis.
Using 1-4 MHz convex probe we calculated in 3 positions of hydronephotic kidney due to obstruction [stone, outside compression] (n=27 cases), due to ureteropelvic junction obstruction [UPJO] (n=30 cases]. We had a control group of normal kidney (n=36 cases).
Không có nhận xét nào :
Đăng nhận xét