Discussion
In this study,
all 88 patients (100%) with acute pancreatitis had a diagnosis by ARFI
elastography, whereas only 47 patients (53.4%) had a correct diagnosis by
B-mode sonography. Computed tomographic scans were performed on 41 of the 88
patients, and only 31 of these patients (76%) had a correct diagnosis. These
results demonstrate the high success rate of ARFI elastography for diagnosing
acute pancreatitis and the superiority of this method to B-mode sonography and
CT.
Success rates
for identifying abnormalities on sonography in patients with acute pancreatitis
range from 33% to 90%.3 Sonography is a useful tool for detecting
gallstones, which are important in the etiology of acute pancreatitis. It is
also used to exclude other potential causes of acute abdominal pain. However,
because the pancreatic parenchyma is difficult to detect in obese patients and
patients with flatulence, diagnosis of acute pancreatitis based on sonography
can be difficult.3
Computed
tomography is accepted as the primary imaging technique for diagnosis of acute
pancreatitis and detection of its severity.3 The advantages of CT lie in its abilities to
image retroperitoneal organs, abdominal ligaments, the mesentery, the omentum,
and the pancreas. The diagnostic sensitivity of CT for acute pancreatitis
ranges from 77% to 92%.14–16 In patients with less severe acute
pancreatitis, CT results may be negative.2 In our study, 10 patients with CT scans that
revealed a normal pancreatic size, a normal pancreatic density and
heterogeneity, and no peripancreatic inflammation or fluid had a diagnosis of
acute pancreatitis by ARFI imaging. This finding suggests that ARFI
elastography can successfully detect pancreatic inflammation visually and
quantitatively even in cases of less severe pancreatitis.
The
inflammation observed in acute pancreatitis may be segmental rather than
diffuse. With a frequency of 18%, the segmental form is rare,17,18 generally involves the pancreatic head, and
occurs with stones.19–21 We found that the inflamed segments of the
pancreas had color scores higher than 2 on the VTI images, and the unaffected
areas had scores of 1 or 2. In 10 patients (11.3%) with segmental involvement,
only the head was affected, and 5 (5.6%) had involvement of the head and a
portion of the body. Among all of the patients with segmental involvement, the
VTQ values were higher for inflamed tissue sites than those of noninflamed or
less inflamed sites. These data show that ARFI elastography can be used to
visualize the location of inflammation in the pancreas and to determine whether
that inflammation is segmental.
During the
arterial phase of intravenous administration of a contrast medium bolus, the
normal pancreas should enhance homogeneously. Mild inflammation and
interstitial edema do not interfere with the expected homogeneous enhancement
of the gland. When necrosis is present, an absence of contrast enhancement,
liquefaction, and changes in the density or signal intensity of the gland are
observed. A study of a series of 93 patients found an overall accuracy rate of
85% for CT, with 100% sensitivity for extensive glandular necrosis.22 In this present study, the virtual and
quantitative VTQ values for the necrotic areas were evaluated for the 6
patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Computed tomography is more accurate
than sonography for detection of necrotic areas in the pancreatic parenchyma.
The necrotic areas in the pancreas appeared enlarged and hypoechoic on B-mode
sonography, which suggests decreased stiffness, and produced low VTQ values on
ARFI imaging. The VTI scores for the enlarged glands were either 1 or 2, and
quantitative measurements of the necrotic areas ranged from 0.5 to 1.2 m/s.
Based on these results, ARFI elastography may be helpful for diagnosis of
necrotic pancreatitis.
Only 1 previous
study in the literature evaluated the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis with ARFI
elastography. In that study, patients with acute pancreatitis and those with
resolving pancreatitis were compared with patients who had chronic pancreatitis
and a control group.20 The authors of that study reported average VTQ
values of 2.38 m/s for the patients with acute pancreatitis and 1.28 m/s for
those with a normal pancreas. We found a mean VTQ value of 2.14 ± 0.74 m/s and
a range of 1.1 to 4.47 m/s for the patients with acute pancreatitis. The mean
VTQ value for normal parenchyma was 1.17 ± 0.24 m/s and ranged from 0.6 to 1.63
m/s. A previous study reported VTQ values ranging from 1.48 to 2.50 m/s in
acute resolving pancreatic necrosis, whereas we found that VTQ values ranged
from 0.5 to 1.2 m/s in necrosis. In the previous study, the VTQ cutoff value
was chosen as the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (1.792–2.157 m/s)
of the mean VTQ value of the entire study population (2.088 ± 1.155 m/s) and
was rounded to 2.2 m/s. The acute and resolving pancreatitis groups were
distinguished with 97.1% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity. In contrast, we
found that VTQ distinguished pancreatitis from normal parenchyma with 100%
sensitivity and 98% specificity when the cutoff point was defined as 1.63 m/s.
The differences between the previous study and our study may be attributable to
our study’s exclusion of patients with chronic pancreatitis or the combination
of patients with acute and resolving pancreatitis in the previous study.
Our study had
limitations. First, the quality of the images obtained with ARFI elastography
depends on the abilities of the operator. Optimal images and quantitative
results cannot be obtained from patients with tachypnea, tachycardia, or
obesity. In obese patients, the pancreas is located deep inside the body (>8
cm), and this evaluation cannot be performed. Another limitation of the ARFI
technique is limited visualization of the pancreas on B-mode sonography. Since
ARFI evaluation of the pancreas starts after B-mode sonography, poor
visualization of the pancreas on B-mode sonography may result in inadequate
interpretation of the pancreas on VTI and VTQ. In our study, we excluded obese
patients, since visualization of the pancreas on B-mode sonography was
difficult. Additionally, the relationship between ARFI elastographic results
and the severity of pancreatitis was not assessed in terms of morbidity and
mortality. However, we believe that this study will lead to other, more
exhaustive studies in the future.
In conclusion,
ARFI elastography is a noninvasive, radiation-free, rapid, and reproducible
imaging method that can efficiently diagnose acute pancreatitis at hospital
admission. It provides reliable results that visualize the distribution of
inflammation in glands, peripancreatic inflammation, and necrosis. Furthermore,
the positive diagnoses yielded by elastography in patients with negative CT
findings are novel results.
ARFI for NORMAL PANCREAS at MEDIC CENTER=Of 30 normal pancreas from 30 male inviduals, age 20-40 yo, we have mean elastic velocity of pancreas = 0.96+/-0.16 m/s (range 0.6-1.19m/s) while according to Goya et al in the text above, the mean VTQ value for normal parenchyma was 1.17 ± 0.24 m/s and ranged from 0.6 to 1.63 m/s.
NHÂN CA VIÊM TỤY CẤP N 3 TẠI MEDIC.
Sau uống rượu đau bụng nhiều từ 3 ngày trước, bệnh nhân được khám siêu âm, thử máu amylasemia không tăng, lipase tăng và CRP tăng. CT cho thấy viêm tụy phần đuôi, có tạo nang giả như siêu âm ARFI tụy.
Ca viêm đầu tụy khu trú tái phát:
Tổn thương phù nề echo poor có nang hóa vùng đầu=76x88mm, ARFI=2,6-2,8m/s; thân và đuôi bình thường. ARFI thân và đuôi v=1,9cm/s
CA VIÊM TỤY MẠN [UỐNG RƯỢU]
Mô tụy xơ hóa toàn bộ, có vôi hóa rải rác, kích thước=23-13-17mm. Ông tụy chính Wirsung giãn 7-12mm không sỏi, thành dày nhiễm cứng.
ARFI mô tụy= 1,78-1,84m/s
Không có nhận xét nào :
Đăng nhận xét